Judicial Misconduct and Impeachment Procedures in India

The Supreme Court of India ruled that Parliament can initiate the removal of a judge without a recommendation from the Chief Justice, addressing a critical gap in handling judicial misconduct.

Why This Matters

Judicial integrity and accountability are vital public interests, making this topic highly relevant for discussions around law, governance, and reform.

Public Sentiment Summary

Public sentiment reveals a widespread criticism of the Indian judiciary, marked by frustration over perceived corruption and a lack of accountability among judges. There is an urgent call for comprehensive reforms to establish transparency and ensure justice for all. Many express skepticism regarding the effectiveness of impeachment procedures, feeling hopeless about significant changes in the system.

Highlighted Comments

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

Judges= minimum accountability & maximum authority. Court staff= maximum accountability & minimum authority.

The judiciary needs a complete revamp and make it transparent. Law should be equal for everyone.

System is rotten to the core, and just one cog somehow coincidentally malfunctioning will not be allowed to bring the entire system down.

A corrupt judge being merely transferred as 'punishment' shows how fucked up my country is.

Parties Involved

  • Judiciary of India
  • Government of India
  • Public

What the people want

Judiciary of India: Implement transparent reforms to restore public trust and accountability.

Government of India: Take immediate action to address corruption and ensure justice for all citizens.

Public: Unite and demand accountability and justice from our judicial system.